To all my
fellow punk rock and metal aficionados, I open with this message: if the title
of this rant offends you, I’m well pleased with my work and will now defend the
simple statement which brought you angrily to this page and ultimately raised
my Google ranking.
We all know,
or should know, what Vichy France is famous for: surrender and collaboration
during World
War II.
I am by NO means calling punks Nazis or Nazi sympathizers. What I am
doing is criticizing their apolitical tendencies. So many people in the punk and metal music scenes
are avowedly apolitical. They’re
convinced “the system” is completely rigged (which it largely is) and they refuse to participate in the system or
the “political machine.” Many of them
also advocate anarchy.
The problem in
the punk scene is that most anarchists’ understanding of anarchy itself and
spontaneous order is very superficial, which ultimately makes their belief in
anarchy superficial as well. Recall that
the fascist French State’s existence resulted from a surrender of the French
armed forces in the early battle for France and a desire to spare the French
people and infrastructure from German destruction. Many French cities, towns, and landmarks were
destroyed in World
War I as the Germans advanced through much of
France. Paris itself would have become a
trench battlefield had the U.S. Marines not pushed the Germans back at Belleau
Wood. The widespread destruction of the
First World War was not forgotten, and the French people had no desire to see
their country destroyed again.
The French did
not surrender or collaborate because they particularly liked the Germans or
fascism. They felt they had lost the war
and they gave up, settling for what they thought was the lesser of two evils to
avoid total destruction as a nation and people.
The majority
of the French people equally despised the Vichy French government and the Third
Reich. Still, they tolerated daily life
under the puppet government and the German occupiers. They tolerated the military and police
checkpoints and kept their mouths shut in order to avoid arrest. They had very little, if any, say in
governmental affairs and mostly lived an apolitical life, simply trying to
survive with their families. They
figured they were screwed, so they gave up.
The fact that they lived outside of the system did not make the Vichy
French government or the Third Reich any weaker, nor did it create any
difficulties for the oppressive fascist authorities.
This same
apathetic defeatism towards the political process is rampant in the punk
scene. Punks are convinced that nothing
they do will matter so they’re better off just staying outside of
politics. There’s a fatal flaw in their
logic: the resignation of the people in Vichy France neither rolled back the
German invaders nor stopped the authorities from arresting random people and
killing Jews. So too the
non-participation of punks in politics doesn’t scale back the size and reach of
oppressive government nor does it prevent it from over-taxing the working
people, sending people to prison for marijuana, or waging undeclared wars
abroad.
 |
| Anarcho-communism |
However, while
they may be apolitical, most punk rockers hold onto some kind of political
ideology or personal philosophy which shapes their worldview. Many people in the music scene are in love
with Karl Marx’s lofty-sounding ideas even though they’re highly
self-contradictory and inconsistent with human nature. According to Marxist theory, there are three
stages of history remaining: capitalism, with bourgeois government that favors
the so-called 1%; socialism, which demands a huge proletarian government to
take over all sectors of the economy and civil society; and communism, with no
government, no monetary system, and total harmony among humankind.
If the punks
and metal heads shouting “Anarchy!” were familiar with the groundbreaking work
of Murray Rothbard, the greatest anarchist intellectual and one of the greatest
libertarians who ever lived, they would find their entire worldview radically
changed for the better. In “The Death Wish of the Anarcho-Communists,”
Rothbard explains that even though anarcho-capitalism and anarcho-communism
advocate libertarian ideas, the latter is doomed to fail while only the former
can succeed.
Anarcho-communism
can’t exist because the maximum liberty talked about in the theory actually breaks
down and disappears during the socialist stage of history. After all, how can there be liberty when the
government is very large, the state runs all parts of society, and all members
of society are servants of the state? Not
only is there a lack of freedom, but no one is allowed to make a profit or any
kind of gain over anyone else, which destroys people’s incentive to work hard
and excel. All of this kills progress
and prosperity. This is exactly what
happened in the Soviet Union. People
like to blame Stalin for killing socialism’s big chance to succeed, as if
Soviet socialism was a warped product of Stalin. In reality, Stalin was merely a product of
the easily corruptible Marxist system, just as Jim Crow was the product of
harsh Reconstruction and today’s incomprehensible Ozzy Osbourne is the product
of too much substance-enhanced partying.
 |
| Murray N. Rothbard |
Murray
Rothbard makes a strong case for anarcho-capitalism and libertarian ideas. Aside from his monolithic books, Rothbard has
penned hundreds of groundbreaking essays and articles that would serve as
excellent portals into the libertarian and anarchist philosophy. A great article of his and an equally great
starting point for new libertarians is “War, Peace,
and the State” which explains the libertarian
non-aggression principle—as free individuals, I agree not to hurt you if you
agree not to hurt me—and how war and plunder are necessary for the health of
the oppressive state.
Rothbard’s essay
“Anatomy of the
State” (also published as a short book)
expounds on the predatory nature of governments and “the state” against
individuals and their liberty.
Especially compelling is the way he portrays “government” as small,
elite collections of individuals using the broad powers of a legal fiction
called “the state” to oppress and prey on other individuals. “Left,
Right, and the Prospects for Liberty” shatters the
narrow illusion of the political left and the political right. The illusion to which I refer is familiar to
everyone: even if a person is neither “Democrat” nor “Republican,” they’re
still expected to belong either to “the left” or “the right” of the political
spectrum, as if there was no middle ground or third alternative. “Left, Right” continues in making a case for
libertarianism and maximum liberty for the individual as the third alternative. Such would be the ideal system for punks and
others in the music scene, since rock ‘n’ roll itself symbolizes a rebellion
from the conventional norms of mainstream society and the desire of rockers to
govern their own lives and determine their own destiny.
Most punks and
others on this side of the rock ‘n’ roll macro-community are determined to
remain apolitical and not participate in the political process. They fail to understand, however, that the
political process is not at all limited to the voting booth on Election
Day. The political process includes
activism and education in order to change people’s minds and attitudes,
enacting change in the national dialogue, eventually enacting change in public
policy (i.e. law and government actions).
If the wannabe
anarchists in the music scene read Rothbard’s groundbreaking works, they would find
not only a solid foundation for establishing deep beliefs, but they would also
be moved to become politically involved. Their involvement in the political
process as agents of change could start a chain of events that would eventually
rollback and repeal layers of government, giving maximum freedom to the individual. In this digital age where media,
communication, and networking are easily done with a click, punks have more
power than they’re willing to give themselves credit for.
Going back to
World War II, most of the French may have given up and tolerated the Third
Reich and its puppet Vichy government, but there was a core of noble people who
didn’t. Small groups of passionate men
and women with firearms, contraband publications, and intelligence networks formed
the noble French Resistance. It was
these loosely coordinated groups of courageous people who fought with
everything they could and made life difficult for the fascists. Had it not been for these people, the
invasion and liberation of France by the Allied forces would not have been nearly
as successful. Had the Resistance not
performed during their finest hour, the Allied advance through France and
Western Europe would have been significantly slower, many more Allied troops
would have been killed, and the Holocaust wouldn’t have been stopped until much
later.
 |
| Members of the Resistance taken prisoner by the fascist Milice |
Many punks use
the corruption of the American political process to justify their
nonparticipation. Even though our
government today is guilty of committing the same grievances the founding
fathers had against Great Britain at the time of the American Revolution, we have
not been forced to take up arms for violent revolution. Today we’re incredibly lucky that we have the
privilege of engaging in a peaceful revolution already in motion on the
political scene. It’s now possible and essential
for as many people to be involved in politics as possible. Our battlefields are the street corners, the
talk shows and blogs, and the ballot box.
Those who are involved are the lifeblood of our unique American
democracy.
Those who
choose not to participate make it easier for democracy to be hijacked by
special interests who write laws in their own favor, especially by government
entities that grow themselves and grant themselves infinitely more power. American democracy must be preserved in order
to roll back government and restore maximum individual liberty. Whether a person believes in limited
government or anarchy—no government at all—it’s irresponsible to simply
proclaim an idea without doing anything whatsoever to help make it a reality.
Hence,
whenever I wear my Ron Paul t-shirt to a show and some nitwit throws up his
fist and shouts “Anarchy!” I can only do a face-palm to occupy my hand, which
otherwise would have been used to slap him for his ignorance. After all, that nitwit’s become no different
from the pseudo-intellectual hipster who throws around names like Jean-Paul
Sartre and Noam Chomsky without having a true understanding of their ideas (but
that’s a whole other rant for another day).
Where I come from we call these pseudo-intellectuals “phonies.”
Ron Paul—a
member of the Republican Party, of all parties!—is the first great statesman in
modern-day America to bring lofty ideas of limited government and maximum
individual liberty to the table in an inspiring manner. His run for the Presidency truly changed the
national dialogue. For the first time,
people of all ages and political persuasions are discussing abolishing the
Federal Reserve banking cartel, ending the War on Drugs, and rolling back the
American Empire by bringing all troops home and not policing the world.
 |
| "Dr. Ron Paul" by Caleb O'Connor |
Paul’s ideas
resonated with a lot of people. Between
the combined primary election and caucus votes across the country, Paul’s
platform of liberty and tolerance earned over 2 million votes. Paul may not have won the GOP nomination, but
he inspired at least 100,000 college students to share his ideas and sign up to become activists who will
inevitably achieve a snowball effect in popularizing libertarian ideas. Many of these young activists have joined the
Republican Party and are currently swinging its platform from an oppressive
neoconservative one to a libertarian one.
Better yet,
Paul’s ideas are becoming increasingly mainstream, even penetrating the music
scene. Celebrity musicians from all
genres are subscribing to libertarian ideas.
Pop singers Kelly Clarkson and John Mayer endorsed Ron Paul. ANTiSEEN’s Joe Young has made libertarianism
his philosophy, as well as blues guitarist Jimmy Vaughn and country star Dwight
Yoakam. Perhaps the most famous
libertarian punk rocker is former Misfits front man Michale Graves, a
passionate Ron Paul supporter who continues to advocate libertarian ideas. Graves will soon be touring to promote his new
“Vagabond” album.
If one man managed
to convince millions of voters, inspire hundreds of thousands of activists, and
change the national dialogue, what is every punk rocker’s excuse for not
participating? Murray Rothbard wrote and
educated. Ron Paul ran for office and
inspired large masses. You and I must
carry the ideas of maximum liberty and rugged individualism into civil society
and to the ballot box.
What the
apathetic people in the music scene are failing to grasp is that American democracy
does not have to be top-down. Federal
elections may be easily corrupted, but the same isn’t true for city council
elections. How difficult is it to rally
around a level-headed member of the community?
One who believes the police are better utilized going after burglars and
robbers than pot smokers, who thinks the local school board ought to have more
sway over the curriculum than the lobbyist-owned bureaucrats in the U.S.
Department of Education, and that a permit shouldn’t be required every time
more than two people want to practice their First Amendment right in public… Such people exist, but they’ll never be found
as long as we in the punk and metal communities (and all other communities)
maintain apathetic attitudes.
Now that you’ve
read this you must ask yourself: will
you be like Vichy France or will you join the peaceful resistance?
* * *
Anarcho-capitalism image obtained from Wikimedia Commons and is in the public domain. Anarcho-communism image was obtained from Mises.org via CC BY 3.0 license. Rothbard portrait obtained from Wikimedia Commons courtesy of Mises.org via the same license.
French Milice and Resistance POWs photo courtesy of Sammlung von Repro-Negativen (Bild 146) through the German Federal Archives. It was obtained from Wikimedia Commons and used via CC BY-SA 3.0 license.
Ron Paul painting is the work and property of Caleb O'Connor. Use of the image does not necessarily mean Mr. O'Connor endorses the views in the article and is used primarily to promote Mr. O'Connor's work. See more of his excellent paintings at CalebOConnor.com
I originally submitted this article for the Mises Daily but the editor at Mises.org blew me off twice. Poo on you, sir.