[Mini-podcast] What was the 'Free Libertarian Party'?

From 'My LPeeps! Libertarian Mini-podcast'

What was the Free Libertarian Party of 1972, and what made it different from the Libertarian Party that was founded in 1971? 

"In 1974, two years after the founding of the Free Libertarian Party, Mr. Tuccille ran for governor of New York. He hoped to win the 50,000 votes that would give the party a permanent place on the ballot, a first step toward becoming the third major political party in the United States..."

It turns out New York has some interesting political history that overlaps and even predates the Libertarian Party!  Learning about the Free Libertarian Party was a warm welcome for a Libertarian nerd like me.

Listen on Soundcloud

Going to war against the Police [Updated for 2017]

On the afternoon of Saturday, December 20, 2014, a man traveled from Baltimore to Brooklyn, where he shot dead two police officers. My condolences went out to the families of NYPD officers Wenjian Liu and Rafael Ramos.

Some of the mixed responses I saw to this double homicide sickened me almost as much as the news itself. Many of you reading this were sickened by the news of the deaths of Eric Garner and Michael Brown, as was the shooter in Brooklyn, Ismaaiyl Brinsley.

Given police speculation that Brinsley had committed another homicide back in Baltimore, planned for killing police, and that he killed himself after the incident, I concluded the shooter was crazy and disturbed similar to the Columbine shooters.

This murderous violence, motivated partly by politics and partly by insanity, only prolonged the stalemated gun control debate. It will also continue the discussion on civil liberties and the militarization of police in America.

Many in the liberty movement not only oppose the State institution of the police, or the State’s monopoly on security (which is reasonable).  They actually take it farther and hate the police, as a group and as individuals. I had the misfortune of arguing with a handful of people who were actually glad these officers were ambushed and murdered.

If you’re one of these people who celebrated their deaths, and who celebrates the deaths of police officers, I’m ashamed of you.

This is horrible. Furthermore, the families of Michael Brown and Eric Garner expressed outraged by these killings, and their outrage was more than justifiable. After all, the families didn’t lose their sons violently so that their memory could be used to justify more violence and death. It’s one hell of a slippery slope.

By no means should libertarians, who value the right to life and individual self-determination more than any other ideological group, celebrate the murder of any human beings. That’s exactly what this ambush was. It wasn’t a rebel military operation, nor was it any kind of revolutionary action, despite being partly motivated by politics. The shooter was mentally unbalanced.

I remind you all that libertarians view people first and foremost... Read more

Challenge President Trump but Cheer On the First Lady

My friends and my readers know that as a proud Libertarian Party member, I oppose many if not most of President Trump's policies. Nonetheless, I still thoroughly respect him for being the worthiest, most difficult political adversary I've ever faced. These days, he seems not to know how to lose!

I'll oppose him in the political arena and I'll do my best to scale back federal power over the states and the people, but I'll also do my best to learn from his winning strategies. I'll do so knowing he's not thin-skinned, and he understands that's what opposition parties do.  I know he'll continue vigorously defending his policies while I vigorously attack them.  Despite what I believe are my moral obligations as a Libertarian, I’m nothing short of impressed with the new First Lady.

For starters, I vehemently disagree with the hypocritical liberals making negative comments about her occasional nude photoshoots as a supermodel.  I thought we had already established that women have the right to do what they please with their bodies, and that slut shaming is not okay!  I admire everything she had accomplished in her career.  She is literally a self-made woman who grew up designing and sewing her own clothes, who worked her own way out of a Communist republic to become a supermodel in New York City.  This was all before she met the current President.  I took great delight in reading a well-written, well-researched article on how she’s the archetypal wife and mother from Proverbs 31, and encourage all to read it as well.

That being said, the negative comments being made about Barron in the news media and on social media are absolutely unacceptable.  Barron is 10 years old; he’s a child and is OFF LIMITS to the public.  Anyone who goes after him will be fair game for public ridicule.   I’m equally disgusted by the abhorrent behavior of all the right-wingers who wished Sasha Obama a happy 15^th birthday by commenting on her Facebook page with horrible racial slurs about her family going back to Africa. President Obama may have been born abroad, but Michelle LaVaughn Robinson is the girl from the South side of Chicago (you right-wing garbage peddlers!).  If either Barron Trump or Sasha Obama were involved in the Boy Scouts of America (two BSA sub-groups are co-ed), I’d be happy to teach them both how to shoot safely and participate in shooting sports at my BSA ranges—and not talk politics the entire time.

As the grandson of dirt-poor immigrants, I think it's wonderful that immediately after the first black FLOTUS, America has its first immigrant First Lady: the beautiful and magnificent Melanija Knavs Trump.  I can’t help but agree with Dr. Michio Kaku that the H1B visa just might be what saves America.  Society has many ills, but these little social victories are reminders that humanity might be getting better after all.

I've decided to formally invite the First Lady to this December's military and veterans ball (but I'm not telling you loquitos which one). At this time there's really no other accomplished human being with whom I'd rather spend an evening talking and dancing. I know it's a long shot but I'm sending the invitation anyway.  I talked it over with my lovely Russian-born friend Natyusha (who is also a fan of Melania Trump), and should the First Lady accept the invitation, the three of us will go together and we’ll call it the first meeting of the Eastern European Women for Liberty caucus.  How wonderful is it that an immigrant risen to such prominence inspires Americans like Natyusha and I.

Our politics need not rule our relationships with our fellow human beings.  Let there be dialogue.  Let there be understanding.  And, as always, give me liberty or give me death.  It’s time to send an invitation and reach out to a wonderful human being.

Deo Vindice. Allons!

* * *

P.S. I’m still challenging the President and his agenda!

* * *

Philadelphia Style magazine cover digital image courtesy of The Inquisitr.

Going to war against the Police

Saturday afternoon, a man traveled from Baltimore to Brooklyn, where he shot dead two police officers.  My condolences go to the families of NYPD officers Wenjian Liu and Rafael Ramos.

Some of the mixed responses I’ve seen to this double homicide sicken me almost as much as the news itself.  Many of you reading this were sickened by the news of the deaths of Eric Garner and Michael Brown, as was the shooter in Brooklyn, Ismaaiyl Brinsley.

Given police speculation that Brinsley had committed another homicide back in Baltimore, planned for killing police, and that he killed himself after the incident, we can conclude that the shooter was crazy and disturbed similar to the Columbine shooters.

This murderous violence, motivated partly by politics and partly by insanity, will undoubtedly prolong the stalemated gun control debate.  It will also continue the discussion on civil liberties and the militarization of police in America.

Many in the liberty movement not only oppose the State institution of the police, or the State’s monopoly on security, but actually hate the police as a group and as individuals.  I’ve actually dealt with a handful of people who are actually glad these officers were ambushed and murdered.

If you're one of these people who celebrated their deaths, I'm ashamed of you.

This is horrible.  Furthermore, the families of Michael Brown and Eric Garner are outraged by these killings, and their outrage is justifiable.  After all, the families didn’t lose their sons violently so that their memory could be used to justify further violence.  That’s one hell of a slippery slope.  So ask yourself: are you one of those people who will politicize their sons’ deaths?  Will you reduce their deaths to a rallying cry for political violence?

By no means should libertarians, who value the right to life and individual self-determination more than any other ideological group, celebrate the murder of any human beings.  That’s exactly what this ambush was.  It wasn’t a rebel military operation, nor was it any kind of revolutionary action, despite being partly motivated by politics.  The guy was mentally unbalanced.

I remind you all that libertarians view people first and foremost as individuals.  This means one mentally unbalanced individual was angry that specific uniformed individuals killed another individual in Staten Island, New York, and that yet another individual killed another individual in Ferguson, Missouri—therefore, he as an individual chose to murder yet other individuals in the Bronx who wore uniforms, but had nothing to do with the other slayings.  It was as if these killings were supposed to “even the score” between civilians and police.

In the end, all it did was raise the overall body count, leaving police and civilians equally appalled.

Katie Rucke of Mint Press News claims that over 5,000 U.S. civilians have been killed by police since 9/11.  We have no way of knowing at this time which “civilians” were unarmed and oppressed, and which were actually violent creeps caught in the act, who happened to be legally innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.  Nonetheless, the statistic is staggering.

However, violence in America is NOT one-sided.

2014 saw 66 police officers die from assault, vehicular assault, gunshot wounds, and other hostile actions (Officer Down Memorial Page counts the death toll for this year at 113 including non-hostile deaths).  At least 972 American police officers have been killed by hostile actions since the day after 9/11—the toll rises 1,106 if we count the terrorist attacks and slow death from 9/11-related illness.  Worse yet, over 16,300 homicides took place in America in 2014 alone.

I don’t deny that America has a problem with militarized police.  I also acknowledge the issues raised by the gun control debate—I think we need psycho control, not gun control, but I haven’t ignored the opposition’s arguments.

I also take heat on a regular basis from within the liberty movement because I don’t jump on the Let’s-Hate-Cops bandwagon.  I was raised by two police officers (both of whom respect civil rights and voted for Ron Paul). I still see cops—civilians as well—as individuals before I see them as members of a group.  I also see that 93% of homicides committed in America were not committed by police.

This points out a sickening new angle to the problem of violence in America: Poorly trained/indoctrinated cops kill civilians, other civilians kill cops, and while Americans are ranting and debating this issue, civilian criminals kill 15,000 other civilians without America batting an eye.

Folks, going to war against the police will not help save civilians, nor will it secure our civil liberties.  This will only raise the body count and justify the paranoia of trigger-happy police officers while the State cracks down on freedom.

Rather than adopt the insane  crusade of encouraging Christopher Dorner-style campaigns against the police, we in the liberty movement need to be shining examples of humility, respect for the sanctity of life, and respectful towards the fallen and their mourning families.

We have a lot of work to do in reforming policing in America.  Better yet, we have the doubly difficult task of not only suggesting reforms, but also innovative ways to minimize the State’s monopoly on security and transfer part of that burden to citizen volunteers and private industry.  However, to change people’s thinking and get them to think the way we do, we have to display strong character.

The opposition will only take time to listen to us if they respect us, and most people’s respect is earned, not given.  This means that we command respect not only through being fluent in our talking points and arguments, but we earn respect by showing nothing but respect for those who disagree with us.

Framingham, MA memorial to fallen police

Being kind and respectful begins with the way we approach the dead.  I’m very sorry that the two NYPD officers were murdered, as I’m sorry another officer in Florida was murdered yesterday.

As a human being with compassion, my heart is heavy to know that children are going to grow up without fathers.  The same goes for the children of people killed by police.  The same also goes for the children of the 15,000+ people who were killed by fellow civilians in 2014.

In the meantime, let’s not advocate violence against the police, or against the state, or against anyone.  We need to formulate liberty-based solutions for public safety.  Violence as self-defense is acceptable, but ex-post facto retaliation borders on violating the non-aggression principle.  Furthermore, a war against the government is something to be avoided.  I’d rather bring libertarian change through fifty years of activism and reform rather than 50 days of civil war.

Everyone will lose that war.

The now-iconic image

* * *

Sirens and lights photo by Junior Libby and is in the public domain.  Sheriff SWAT photo by the Oregon Department of Transportation. Framingham Police Memorial photo by "Daderot" and released into the public domain. Ferguson Hug photo courtesy of CBS News and used in accordance with Fair Use laws.